Aeriqo logo
Aeriqo
Back to Guides

Commuter Cycling: Exposure vs Dose (Why Stoplights Matter)

Understanding the dose equation for cycling commuters and how route choices change your actual pollutant intake.

Quick Answer

Inhaled dose = concentration × breathing rate × time. Depending on intensity, cyclists often process 2–4 times more air per minute than car passengers, but may spend less time in traffic. Research consistently shows cycling’s health benefits far outweigh pollution risks. Smart route choices — avoiding main roads and stoplights — can cut your dose by 30–50%.

This is general guidance, not medical advice. Consult a healthcare provider if you have respiratory or cardiovascular conditions.

The Dose Equation

Your actual pollutant intake depends on three variables, each of which you can influence to some degree:

Inhaled Dose = Concentration (µg/m³) × Ventilation Rate (L/min) × Duration (min)

Concentration is what’s in the air around you. Ventilation rate is how much air you process per minute. Duration is how long you’re exposed. Reducing any one of these three factors lowers your total inhaled dose.

Breathing Rates by Mode

How much air you process depends on your activity intensity:

Walking

~15 L/min. Gentle pace means relatively low air intake per minute.

Cycling (moderate)

~30 L/min. Steady commuting pace roughly doubles the ventilation rate compared to walking.

Cycling (hard)

~45 L/min. Hard efforts on hills or sprints push ventilation significantly higher.

Driving

~8 L/min. Seated and at rest, car occupants process the least air per minute.

Higher ventilation rate means more air processed per minute — and more pollutants drawn into your lungs. This is why intensity matters, not just duration.

Why Cyclists Inhale More

Despite being in traffic for less time on most commutes, cyclists often process significantly more air per minute than car occupants (commonly around 2–4x, depending on intensity). Over a typical commute, this means more total air — and potentially more pollutants — pass through a cyclist’s lungs.

However, the picture is more nuanced than it first appears. Car cabins are not sealed environments. In-car concentrations can be similar to or even higher than on-bike concentrations, depending on ventilation settings, whether windows are open, and position in traffic. Cyclists also tend to ride at the edge of traffic, while drivers sit in the middle of the exhaust cloud during congestion.

Check Your Route's Air Quality

See segment-by-segment AQI along your running or cycling route before heading out.

Try Aeriqo Free

Stoplight Hotspots

Intersections with traffic lights are where vehicles idle and then accelerate, producing peak particle and NO₂ concentrations. Cyclists waiting at a red light are stopped in the middle of this pollution cloud — at high breathing rates if they’ve just been pedaling.

The combination of high ambient concentration and elevated breathing rate at stoplights creates a disproportionate share of your total commute dose, even though you may only spend a few minutes at red lights.

Plan routes that minimize stoplights. At intersections, position yourself upwind of traffic when possible and avoid standing directly behind idling vehicles.

Route Choice Impact

Side streets and separated cycle paths can have substantially lower concentrations than main roads. A route one block off the main arterial may add a couple of minutes to your commute but reduce your pollution exposure by 30–50%.

Slightly longer but lower-intensity routes also help. If a quieter route lets you ride at a more moderate pace, your breathing rate drops too — reducing dose from both the concentration and ventilation sides of the equation.

E-bikes can reduce dose further by lowering the rider’s exertion level. With pedal assist, you breathe less heavily for the same speed, directly lowering the ventilation-rate component of your inhaled dose.

Benefits Outweigh Risks

Multiple large-scale studies — including de Hartog et al. (2010), Tainio et al. (2016), and Cepeda et al. (2017) — consistently find that the cardiovascular and mortality benefits of cycling far exceed the health costs of pollution exposure, by a wide margin.

This holds true even in moderately polluted cities. The goal is not to avoid cycling, but to minimize exposure through smart route choices and timing. For most people, regular cycling remains a net health gain — even in imperfect air.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do cyclists really breathe in more pollution than drivers?

Per minute, often yes — commonly around 2–4 times more air volume, depending on riding intensity. But per trip, it depends on route, duration, and in-car ventilation settings. Drivers sitting in congested traffic with windows down can also accumulate significant exposure.

Does wearing a mask while cycling help?

An N95 or equivalent mask filters PM2.5 effectively when properly fitted. For commuting at a moderate pace, it can meaningfully reduce your particle dose. At high intensity, the added breathing resistance may not be practical for everyone.

How much do e-bikes reduce pollution dose?

By lowering your exertion, an e-bike can reduce your breathing rate significantly, which directly lowers your inhaled dose by a proportional amount — even though the ambient concentration stays the same.

Should I avoid cycling on high-AQI days?

Not necessarily. Even on moderate-AQI days (51–100), the health benefits of cycling typically outweigh the risks. On days with AQI above 150, consider alternative transport or an indoor workout instead.

Is cycling behind a bus worse than in a bike lane?

Yes. Directly behind diesel vehicles, you are in the exhaust plume with peak concentrations. A separated bike lane, even just a few meters offset from traffic, significantly reduces this exposure.

Ready to Check Your Route?

Draw a route or upload your GPX file to see air quality across every segment. Free to start, no credit card needed.

Get Started Free

Related Guides